The Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transit (HART) board of directors will meet at 8 a.m. tomorrow, and there are several things we should all be concerned about:
• a resolution requesting that the Honolulu City Council approve a bond float for the much-talked-about $44 million for HART marketing and personnel costs;
• the potential that the board “may” go into Executive Session regarding several issues that should be discussed in public; and
• the lack of a discussion item regarding the state auditor’s concern about HART management recording employees during interviews.
When I read the agenda, I was shocked to see a resolution requesting that the Honolulu City Council approve the issuance of bonds to cover the $44 million. This $44 million was initially put into the city’s capital improvement (CIP) budget by the mayor and then moved to HART’s CIP budget by the council.
During two months of budget discussions, we were told several times that HART had the money to pay these costs. We were reassured that no bonds would be needed for next fiscal year. Even as recently as the June 6 full council meeting, the $44 million was referred to as just “a placeholder,” similar to having a line of credit available.
Who knew that this was not correct? When did they know it? When will we be given accurate and complete information?
It’s also important to note that this resolution calls for the $44 million to be repaid with city funds, which breaks another promise that was made to us with respect to the rail project, i.e., that no city money (read “real property taxes”) would be used for rail construction.
If that isn’t enough for people to be concerned about rail finances, the HART board may go into “Executive Session” on five items including approval of the budgets that the council just passed, the bond approval requests (there’s another one for $450 million), a change order and the discussion on public-private partnerships. (This last one is a biggie, because it will cover the City Center Guideway and Stations – the last major piece of the rail project to be contracted.) All of these issues should be discussed in the open. Executive sessions are closed to the public, however.
What are they trying to hide? Have costs gone up yet again?
And finally, it’s notable that there is no discussion slated regarding management’s policy of recording employees during state audit interviews. During the last HART board meeting, Les Kondo, the state auditor, expressed serious concerns about this practice and asked that it be stopped. A former state attorney general has said it is illegal to record employees in this manner, and at least two board members had questions about the issue. No discussion took place, because corporation counsel stated it wasn’t allowed due to sunshine law restrictions. (Thank you to Tom Yamachika for the reminder that the board could have voted to sunshine the item onto the agenda.) Most employees will likely not feel free to openly discuss their concerns in this type of environment, yet there appears to be no follow up by the board.
I agree with HART board member John Henry Felix -– it’s time for a “forensic audit.” We cannot afford to continue the way we have.
The HART board meeting will be broadcast live on Olelo 53.